Category: Uncategorized

Cascale joined critical conversations in Paris at the recent OECD Forum on Due Diligence in the Garment & Footwear Sector, tackling key challenges in responsible purchasing, traceability, and industry metrics on GHG emissions, wages, and responsible purchasing practices.

Dr. Marsha Dickson, co-founder and president of Better Buying Institute and Cascale’s Better Buying program consultant and Cascale’s James Crowley, manager of transparency and traceability (supply chain); Sophia Ellis, senior manager of transparency and accountability; and Hanna Griesbeck Garcia, manager of stakeholder engagement and project manager of The Industry We Want (TIWW) were among the speakers.

In one session featuring Dickson, the speakers unpacked empirical research on the uptake and impact of due diligence in the sector. They presented the OECD’s new monitoring and evaluation framework for the garment and footwear sector.

It also sought to explore how different user groups could use the framework. Dickson gave an overview of BBI’s surveys, methodology, and learnings about purchasing practices. She shared key findings from the 2024 Better Buying Partnership Index (BBPI) Report, highlighting comparisons and differences in sporting goods versus fashion. Dickson discussed Cascale’s acquisition of key assets of BBI, noting the significant alignment of both organizations’ missions and goals, and highlighted the joint commitment to firmly putting responsible purchasing practices on the global agenda.

The panel included Chikako Oka, associate professor, Université Paris-Est Créteil; Nazma Akter, president, Sommilito Garments Sramik Federation (SGSF); Prathika Kurian, senior manager, factory compliance, SanMar; Rachel Alexander, independent consultant and researcher, Copenhagen Business School & University of Johannesburg; Sarosh Kuruvilla, professor, industrial and labor relations, Cornell University, and Julia Schmidt, senior policy officer, Federal Ministry for Economic Development, Germany.

Later, Crowley and Griesbeck Garcia moderated two well-attended side sessions: “Bridging the Gap: Traceability to Enable Due Diligence” and “Mid-Decade Reflection: Insights from The Industry We Want’s 2025 Metrics and the Road to 2030,” in which Ellis also participated.

Crowley’s session aimed to provide industry guidance on what CSDDD legislation and OECD Guidance mean for data collection strategies, supplier engagement, and risk identification. The session also provided a platform for traceability initiatives to present intelligence, research, and programs that support due diligence for retailers, brands, and manufacturers.

Speakers in this session included Evonne Tan, senior director of data and technology at the Textile Exchange; Dorothy Lovell, sector lead for garments and footwear at the OECD; Lea Esterhuizen, founder and chief executive of &Wider; Josh Taylor, traceability manager at ISEAL; Saqib Shahzad, head of sustainability at Sapphire Diamond and co-founder of Transformers Foundation, and Jannis Bellinghausen, senior director of systems integrity at Better Cotton.

Crowley gave a brief overview of Cascale and the Higg Index, then shared a presentation on traceability guidance to enable risk identification. He showcased a high-level approach to categorizing traceability and supply chain data, focusing on the second step of the OECD guidance stages concerning the CS3D. Crowley noted the current traceability requirements of the CS3D and shared actionable steps companies can take for risk identification and prioritization.

Representing The Industry We Want, Griesbeck Garcia’s session explored the fourth cycle of the TIWW’s Industry Dashboard metrics before opening the discussion to the lived experiences and perspectives of those at the heart of the garment and footwear industry. The session highlighted the year-on-year trajectories of the metrics and explored crucial levers needed to realign the course and shape the industry into one that creates worthy and fair working conditions while safeguarding our planet.

Griesbeck Garcia started the discussion with an overview of the landscape, noting the need for a fundamental shift in power dynamics, greater accountability, and a commitment to implementing and scaling real solutions. Then Ellis shared key insights into the data presented, highlighting the rise in production volumes as a contributor to growing emissions outweighing decarbonization efforts. She emphasized the ongoing imperative for the sector to reduce emissions in alignment with a 1.5-degree future while also addressing the need to challenge traditional business models. During the discussion, she highlighted key essentials for achieving meaningful reductions, including supply chain engagement and effective target setting.

Ellis shared Cascale’s efforts to accelerate industry-wide decarbonization through the Industry Decarbonization Roadmap and address foundational environmental performance basics. She also noted the organization’s progress in driving the adoption of responsible purchasing practices with the purchase of key assets from the Better Buying Institute.

The sessions concluded with a clear consensus from participants across all sessions on an urgent need to collaborate and accelerate collective action to transform the industry.

French Version

Co-digestion of food organics at wastewater treatment plants has emerged as a promising approach to address two significant environmental challenges: the management of organic waste and the production of renewable energy. This process involves the anaerobic digestion of food waste alongside traditional wastewater sludge, offering numerous benefits such as increased biogas production, improved resource recovery and reduced landfill disposal. It is also an opportunity for local governments to leverage existing infrastructure and potentially reduce capital expenditures for new stand alone facilities. 

However, the implementation of co-digestion systems also presents various challenges that need to be addressed for successful operation. This post explores the opportunities and challenges associated with co-digestion of food organics at wastewater treatment plants, with a particular focus on the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) facility as a case study.

Opportunities

Enhanced Biogas Production : One of the primary advantages of co-digesting food waste with wastewater sludge is the significant increase in biogas production. Food waste typically has a higher energy content and biodegradability compared to wastewater sludge alone. The addition of food waste to anaerobic digesters can boost methane yields by 50-185%. This increased biogas production can be utilized for on-site electricity generation, heat production or upgraded to biomethane for injection into natural gas grids or use as vehicle fuel.Improved Resource Recovery : Co-digestion allows for the recovery of valuable resources from food waste that would otherwise be lost in landfills. The process not only generates renewable energy but also produces nutrient-rich digestate that can be used as a fertilizer or soil amendment. This approach aligns with circular economy principles, turning waste into a valuable resource and reducing the environmental impact of both food waste and wastewater treatment.Reduced Landfill Disposal : Diverting food waste from landfills through co-digestion at wastewater treatment plants can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with landfill disposal. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, is produced when organic waste decomposes in landfills. By capturing and utilizing this methane through anaerobic digestion, wastewater treatment plants can contribute to climate change mitigation efforts.Economic Benefits : Co-digestion can provide economic benefits to wastewater treatment plants through increased energy production and potential revenue from tipping fees for accepting food waste. The MMSD, for example, has reported significant cost savings and revenue generation from their co-digestion program.Operational Synergies : Integrating food waste processing into existing wastewater treatment plant infrastructure leverages the facility’s assets and expertise. Wastewater treatment plants already have anaerobic digestion systems in place, making the addition of food waste a relatively straightforward process that can optimize the use of existing facilities.

Challenges

Feedstock Variability and Quality Control : One of the primary challenges in co-digestion is managing the variability in food waste composition and quality. Unlike wastewater sludge, which is relatively consistent, food waste can vary significantly in terms of moisture content, organic loading and contamination levels. This variability can impact digester performance and stability. Implementing robust pre-treatment and screening processes is crucial to ensure consistent feedstock quality.Operational Complexity : Introducing food waste into wastewater treatment plant digesters adds complexity to plant operations. Operators need to carefully balance the ratio of food waste to sludge to maintain optimal digester performance. Overloading digesters with food waste can lead to process instability, foaming and reduced biogas production. The Milwaukee facility, for instance, had to develop specific operational protocols and monitoring systems to manage their co-digestion process effectively.Infrastructure and Equipment Requirements : Many wastewater treatment plants require additional infrastructure and equipment to handle food waste effectively. This may include receiving stations, pre-treatment equipment, additional storage tanks and potentially larger or modified digesters. The capital investment required for these upgrades can be significant and may pose a barrier for some facilities.Regulatory Compliance : Co-digestion of food waste at wastewater treatment plants may be subject to additional regulatory requirements compared to traditional wastewater treatment. This can include permits for solid waste handling, air emissions and digestate management. Navigating these regulatory frameworks can be challenging and time-consuming for wastewater treatment plant operators.Market Development for End Products : While co-digestion produces valuable end products such as biogas and digestate, developing reliable markets for these products can be challenging. For biogas utilization, facilities may need to invest in upgrading equipment or establish partnerships with local utilities. Similarly, finding consistent markets for digestate as a fertilizer product may require extensive quality control and marketing efforts.Public Perception and Community Engagement : Introducing food waste processing at wastewater treatment plants may raise concerns among local communities regarding odours, increased truck traffic and potential environmental impacts. Effective community engagement and education programs are essential to address these concerns and gain public support for co-digestion initiatives.

Case Study: Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District

The MMSD has been a pioneer in implementing co-digestion of food waste at their Jones Island Water Reclamation Facility. This included processing food waste, in 2008 to supplement their anaerobic digestion process.

MMSD’s co-digestion program has demonstrated several successes:

Increased Biogas Production : The addition of food waste has significantly boosted biogas production, allowing the facility to generate more renewable energy.Economic Benefits : The program has generated additional revenue through tipping fees and reduced energy costs.Environmental Impact : By diverting food waste from landfills, MMSD has contributed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the region.

However, MMSD has also faced challenges, including:

Operational Adjustments : The facility had to develop new operational procedures and invest in additional equipment to manage the co-digestion process effectively.Quality Control : Ensuring consistent quality of incoming food waste has required ongoing efforts and collaboration with waste generators.Regulatory Compliance : MMSD had to navigate complex regulatory requirements to implement and expand their co-digestion program.

Co-digestion of food organics at wastewater treatment plants offers significant opportunities for enhancing renewable energy production, improving resource recovery and reducing the environmental impact of waste management. It is also an opportunity for local governments to leverage existing infrastructure and potentially reduce capital expenditures for new stand alone facilities. However, successful implementation requires addressing various challenges, including feedstock management, operational complexity and regulatory compliance. The experience of facilities like the MMSD demonstrates that with careful planning and management, these challenges can be overcome, leading to substantial environmental and economic benefits. As more wastewater treatment plants explore co-digestion, continued research, knowledge sharing, and policy support will be crucial in realizing the full potential of this innovative approach to waste management and renewable energy production.