​Sustainability skills are needed in positions far beyond the C-suite. 

ESG concerns are impacting how consumers, investors and executives make decisions in business and their everyday lives. And just as we have seen a wave of resource commitments toward chief sustainability officer hires at financial firms in previous years, now we will start to see the trickle-down effect. 

Meaning sustainability skills are no longer contained within the C-Suite. Sustainability skills are becoming more integrated across all functions, every position and at every level. Risk, compliance and finance professionals will likely need expanded skills and a deeper familiarity with climate data, for example. 

Part of understanding and strengthening ever-evolving talent needs means unpacking what is driving some of the changes, including pending regulation. 

Following investor demand, the timeline for the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) has confirmed required global climate and sustainability disclosure rules to take effect next year (January 2024). 

The rules, which will be issued by the end of June 2023, will provide a general framework for reporting material on sustainability-related issues and specific rules for climate, including extreme weather events and greenhouse gas emissions, according to the board’s announcement. 

Companies will be required to disclose the risks and opportunities they face related to climate, including the implications for the company’s financial position, performance, prospects, business model and strategy. 

The SEC has also proposed new reporting requirements that will require transparency. Under the new requirements, companies must measure and publish their scope 1 and scope 2 carbon emissions beginning in 2024. And for larger companies, required reporting on scope 3 emissions – carbon emissions from customers and the supply chain – may be enforced next year. 

Climate change is also calling into question the traditional role of corporate sustainability, a company’s leadership initiatives and how their business practices impact society and the planet. 

Investor perception also continues to be an important driver toward leading the push to more sustainable business practices early on, with investors increasingly looking for ways to interrogate and drive business strategy. 

In early 2021, nearly 200 countries agreed at the COP26 summit to improve their emissions-cutting pledges in time for COP27, but only two dozen countries had done so by the time the next summit commenced. 

What we saw was ambitious commitments from companies unable to deliver in time, which spurred mounting pressure from investors for companies to ramp up efforts and action. 

ESG investing, which considers nonfinancial factors like social accountability, can ban investments in gun and fossil fuel companies, for example. ESG fund inflow in the U.S. reached $70 billion in 2021 before falling to $3.1 billion by year 2022, according to Morningstar research. However, it is important to note that inflow to sustainable funds still far outpaced the rest, according to the research. 

That decrease in investments took place against the backdrop of an increasingly political and contentious ESG landscape. This showed that public and shareholder perception holds great sway with financial firms and investors – both favorably and otherwise. 

This means that, in today’s boardrooms, sustainability is becoming a much more vital aspect of an organization’s brand strategy. 

Consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable practices from the companies they interact with and products they purchase. Leaders will be increasingly tasked to go beyond just meeting regulatory standards and net-zero commitments to actions that focus on innovation, healing the environment and having meaningful societal impact. 

For example, Adidas has been increasing their sustainability and usage of recycled materials. The brand aims to only use recycled polyester from 2024 onward to decrease their effect on the environment. Adidas is also set on reducing water consumption in production, using renewable energy and adhering to fair labor practices. 

Sustainability is in constant transformation, but success should be quantifiable. Companies need to set clear goals to drive the direction of the business. 

The need for qualified employees trained in sustainability has led to a war for talent. However, we are running out of time. Companies that set environmental goals for 2030 are starting to realize that’s not that far away anymore. 

Climate change and societal fractures require immediate action. Sustainable goals have to start at the top with buy-in from leadership. From there, the most success will come from companies that invest in training their existing workforce, rather than hiring a select few. 

Gloria Mirrione is Executive Director and Head of Sustainable Finance & Impact Investing, Americas, at Acre. 

Original Source: Directors & Boards | Written by Gloria Mirrione | Published on 28/03/23

About Acre

At Acre, we work with the most aspirational businesses with potential to make real change; from those who are just starting out to those who are well on the journey to crafting a legacy.

Our 18 years’ experience in sustainability recruitment, combined with our extensive global network, enables us to provide talent solutions that are designed to deliver this change.

Through our unique behavioural assessment technology, we understand the types of people, skills and behaviours required to create impact. We can develop these qualities within your existing teams too.

We find talented people and develop their skills to ensure they make a true impact in ambitious, progressive organisations.

Acre. Making companies ready for tomorrow.

DUBLIN, May 3, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — The “Europe Ultrasound Device Market, Size, Forecast 2023-2028, Industry Trends, Growth, Impact of Inflation, Opportunity Company Analysis” report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com’s offering. Europe Ultrasound Market is expected to reach US$…

Automation, employee amenities, and sustainability are just a few considerations for achieving longevity and efficiency from your food processing plant design.

Companies don’t tackle the architectural design and layout of their food processing plants every year—or even every ten years. Facility design requires a long-lens approach: How might the industry change over time? How will consumer trends drive production? What concerns and challenges lay ahead?

Having insight to those questions is key to creating a cost-effective design that’s relevant for decades to come. Based on what we’re seeing in the field, here are seven areas we think will play a significant role in the future of food and beverage facility design.

Safe, cleanable spaces that protect against cross-contamination

Protecting food processing plants against cross-contamination is, and will remain, a top concern for manufacturers—regardless of whether they’re upfitting facilities or building from the ground up. The continuing dominance of fresh food will up the ante as companies sharpen their focus on what’s considered ready-to-eat versus raw. 
These two components play a vital role in that process.

Segregation of spaces: Design features must meet FSMA compliance and guard against cross-contamination. Segregation is holistic and distinct. A plant segregates allergens: raw vs. cooked and clean vs. “dirty.” Essentially, clean spaces should be barricaded from contaminants. There are obvious ways to do this—with physical barriers—but there are other, more intricate, aspects to consider: the proper amount of space between air inlets and exhaust, even room pressurization strategies. Insulated metal panels go a long way when it comes to space segregation. They’re also excellent thermal and vapor barriers.Cleanability: There are many enemies of sterility: condensation, foot traffic, hygiene of the plant and its employees, and breached protocols, among other things. All invite bacteria and pathogens to clean areas, which can lead to contamination, introducing major problems in multiple areas. Special attention must be given to design layouts to ensure employees can access hard-to-reach areas for cleaning, including behind equipment and inside it. Designs with sloping floors and drains ensure ease of frequent cleaning.Tourability for visitors and walk-throughs

Food processing plants often make frequent changes to product lines—switching vendors and suppliers—and inviting potential investors to tour. Touring protocols have always been in place, but we’re seeing new facilities featuring separate touring channels. The pandemic only underscored the need for protection through separation.

Case Study: In 2019, we designed elevated touring corridors for Tuffy’s Treat Company in Delano, Minnesota by combining them with mechanical access areas. It was a double-duty design move—segregating touring for the plant but also freeing up valuable space on the floor, an innovative way to provide flexibility, segregation, and Green Globes certification for its 174,000-square-foot facility.

Sustainability beyond just lip service

We’ve been hearing about sustainability for years, but now it’s a driver of revenue and viability. Consumers wield sustainability as a purchasing criterion, prioritizing retailers who ensure their suppliers have aggressive and transparent goals toward reducing a plant’s carbon footprint.

The EY (Ernst Young) Future Consumer Index in 2022 reported a majority of U.S. consumers believed a company’s behavior is just as important as its products. And 17% said “Planet First” is the first consideration of purchase while another 17% ranked “Society First” as number one. That’s nearing 40 percent of respondents, a big change from a decade ago.

In a recent study, NielsenIQ and FMI – The Food Industry Association, reported 72% of shoppers consider transparency from brands and manufacturers to be “important” or “extremely important.”

Designing a facility with LEED, Green Globes, or Zero Waste guidelines is a win-win, providing well-known accolades that companies can market in relation to how their products are produced. As demonstrated by two projects CRB designed, sustainability is a selling point.

Case Studies: 

For Mars Chocolate North America, CRB designed a number of sustainable features, including a state-of-the-art heat recovery system and rain-harvesting for irrigation and sewage transfer, all while reusing and recycling building materials, helping the 500,000-square-foot Topeka facility achieve its “zero waste to landfill” goal. Food Engineering magazine named it 2015’s Sustainable Plant of the Year.For Mycotechnology, an 86,000-square-foot mushroom fermentation plant in Aurora, Colorado, vertical building decreased the plant’s gas and water consumption, saving over one million gallons of water a year and reducing natural gas usage by 40%. Those bragging rights earned the company Food Engineering magazine’s Sustainable Plant of the Year in 2020.

Flexibility with modular designs

The COVID pandemic launched the term “pivot” for manufacturers in every industry—whether for changing lines mid-production, adapting to supply chain disruption, or operating with fewer employees.

Now that we know it can be done, future designs will require built-in adaptability to circumvent shut-downs and costly delays. Prefabrication, preassembly, modularization, and offsite fabrication—called PPMOF, a process we use in our ONEsolution integrated project delivery method—is one way to ensure food processing plants can customize without losing efficiency. At Mycotechnology, some lines can be switched in less than 10 minutes.

Large rooms with open floorplans gave the same boost to Tuffy’s Treat Company:

Allowing for spaces to be quickly renovated to accommodate new product lines (even for smaller, private labels)Consolidating space so the company could store its own fresh proteins, instead of relying on a third-party contractor to produce shelf-stable productsOffering customizable options tailored for specific equipment and FSMA compliance.

Problem-solving with automation and technology 

Although automation requires less square footage in a food processing plant—sometimes considerably less–it’s more expensive due to technology and equipment costs.

Higher equipment costs for automation must be balanced with lower operational costs. In addition to smaller footprints for production, fewer employees lead to smaller amenity spaces like breakrooms and parking.

For some facilities, automation is so prevalent that they’ve moved toward a “dark warehouse” that hosts mostly robots and materials stored in racks. Automation is not only efficient in process, but in space, requiring a smaller footprint through consolidation.

It’s important to right-size the design of a food processing plant. While companies want the flexibility and efficiency automation brings, the budget often allows the bare minimum. If the design plan exceeds the capital cost budget, designers can modify plans to rein in costs and find a middle ground that satisfies both budget and the need for future flexibility.

Data-driven design borrowed from life sciences

Designing a new facility or upfitting an existing facility doesn’t require a crystal ball. The food and beverage manufacturing industry is increasingly mirroring the biopharma industry when it comes to implementing design changes in real-time.

Today’s technology allows for a shared digital environment that fosters collaboration among the design, architecture, and construction teams.

Contracts, budgets, drawings, and timelines extend the building information modeling (BIM) data, adding another layer of input to propel the project step by step, all while keeping an eye on the target value of the project. Value and cost are constantly assessed to ensure there are no overruns or surprises.

Employee amenities to address the manufacturing labor shortage

A 2021 study by Deloitte and The National Association of Manufacturers estimated more than 2 million manufacturing jobs could be unfulfilled by 2030, costing the industry nearly $1 trillion in 2030 alone.

Furthermore, in the survey, more than 75% of manufacturers said they’d have trouble attracting and retaining workers in 2021 and beyond, with executives reporting they were already struggling to fill higher-paying entry-level positions, let alone recruiting and retaining skilled workers. And close to 50% reported they’d turned away business due to a lack of qualified workers.

Plant amenities and design play a big role in employee attraction and retention—from creating open spaces with natural light to designing comfortable breakrooms. Manufacturers are getting creative on improving the employee experience, outfitting breakrooms with napping spots, foosball tables, and comfortable seating.

Designing for the future

A food processing plant’s design or upfit will directly affect its viability, both as a production facility and a place of employment that will attract a stable labor force. It’s a big decision that requires careful planning, designing, and costing.

At CRB, we help companies design food processing facilities for the future, knowing these facilities play an integral role in providing the nation’s food supply. We recognize that each facility—and company—presents specific challenges, needs, and expectations. We design with careful precision and client input for every step of the process. From inception to completion, we’re listening. We’d love to hear about your project; contact us.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.