What Leaders are Saying about ESG

What Are Thought Leaders / Leading Financial Industry Organizations
Saying About E S G?  Sustainability?

Goldman Sachs – “GS SUSTAIN”  

Over the past five years new analytic tools were developed by global investment bankers Goldman Sachs “to help pick tomorrow’s capital market winners,” and to develop a short list of companies that could be positioned as market winners for the long-term. The GS “Green is Gold” report at the end of 2007 states that there was a 25 percent premium for companies with a good ESG record against peers in the MSCI World Index (since August 2005. To date these are mostly EU and UK companies; 25% are US-based.)  The comprehensive GS SUSTAIN framework created by Goldman Sachs will be a major influence in advancing ESG metrics for investors and analysts and investment bankers in the USA in the months ahead.

CFA Institute (the trade association for financial analysts)

“Investors are generally well-served in analyzing a public company’s financial data, but as more and more firms provide non-financial ESG metrics, investors are finding it challenging to understand and incorporate this into their research models.” – Matt Orsagh, CFA, CIPM, project manager for the Institute’s ESG Manual.

“Successful investing is dependent on one’s ability to discern the factors that influence the market’s valuation of a Company and then judge the accuracy of that valuation.  In recent years non-financial factors – including environmental, social and governance factors – have figured ever more prominently in the value of corporations…ESG factors represent a broad set of intrinsic concerns that may ultimately affect valuation of equity, fixed-income, real estate and infrastructure investments…” – from the CFA Institute’s ESG Manual for Investors. (May 2008)

Bloomberg News – Tracking and Evaluating ESG Factors

Bloomberg News is serviced by 135 bureaus worldwide and supplemented by a huge number of news wires, RSS wires and more, is presenting ESG information through a number of screens: “News, Research, Third Party Data Sets & Research, Indices, Funds, Bloomberg Law, Energy & Emissions, Management & Bios, Financial Analysis, Company Risk, Equity Screening, Equity Scoring, and Portfolio Analysis.”  Using these powerful, sophisticated tools, investors are building their own models for ESG metric evaluation.

Mercer - Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC)

Mercer global [investment] manager research has further evolved its manager research process to evaluate the extent to which fund managers proactively integrate ESG factors into their mainstream investment process (May 2008).  Institutional asset managers are becoming increasingly interested in whether managers behave as active owners of capital and whether they reflect the materiality of ESG in their investment decision-making.  Mercer’s existing ESG research process has been expanded to rate all [investment] managers on their ESG capabilities at the strategy level.   Craig Metrick, US head of Mercer’s responsible lending team:  “For Mercer to take this step sends a clear signal to managers and owners.  Not only do we believe that ESG factors are important, but our clients (some of the largest asset owners in the world) do too.”

Responsible Investor – United Kingdom

Could sovereign wealth funds be the most important trends in ESG investing,” the publishers asked in July 2008?  SWFs – thinking of China, the Middle East, and Singapore – are becoming important shareowners in Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, UBS, and Barclays.  (Estimates are total SWF assets are $3 billion and growing substantially.)  SWFs, says RI, are in different stages of adopting ESG policies for the relationships with their “investees.”  Could we see more divestment – such as Norway’s Global Pension Fund dumping its ownership in Wal-Mart? Norway and the New Zealand SWFs cite higher returns and national values as reasons for a focus on ESG. The largest Norwegian investors are said to be lobbying that country’s top companies to report to a set of standards on the environment, labor and human rights, says RI. 

New York Society of Securities Analysts (NYSSA)

Program, May 2008 – “Responsible Investment Across Asset Classes:  Diversification in ESG Investing.”  Traditionally, socially responsible investing (SRI) was largely limited to public equity and fixed-income funds.  As responsible investing concepts have evolved and increasingly incorporated environmental, social and governance (ESG) analysis into decision-making, an array of investment products has emerged.  These offer market returns, liquidity and diversification; they are relevant for both high net-worth individuals and institutional investors.

Business For Social Responsibility (BSR)

The topic of incorporating ESG criteria as part of a long-term company valuation by financial institutions has been entering mainstream debate in recent years.  Although many mainstream institutions such as ABN AMRO and Goldman Sachs have begun considering the effects of including ESG criteria as part of their fundamental financial analysis, investors are waiting for vetted proof of long-term materiality before fully incorporating the criteria.

If ESG criteria become part of mainstream financial analysis, it can have an important influence on how public companies manage these issues.  It is therefore important to understand how these criteria are being incorporated by mainstream financial institutions, as well as the barriers that have prevented such integration from becoming universally practiced.  [BSR has issued a report on ESG and Mainstream Investing, August 2008]  The report evaluates the challenges that have faced and solutions have been proposed industry-wide.  (for PDF copy of report, click here)

Bill Baue – in Social Funds – com (noted ESG writer)

“ESG Standards – Glass Half-Empty or Half-Full? – The International Finance Corporation arm of the World Bank Group shepherded 30 development finance institutions (DFIs) into signing its “Approach Statement on Corporate Governance.”  Each institution agrees to help raise corporate governance (“G”) to the level of environmental (“E”) and social (“S”) considerations.  Great news – right? Half-full folks say “yes,” welcoming this extension by DFIs; the half-empty folks say “no,” this is “greenwash,” using the socially responsible vernacular to paint a sheet on behavior that is (in their opinion) unsustainable. 

Our own post on Bill’s story in Accountability – Central

Well done – Bill Baue is one of the best, most informed commentators writing in depth on the important corporate social responsibility (CSR), socially responsible investing (SRI) and sustainability issues affecting the private, public and social sectors.  As the world of business shrinks and we become more of the global village, and as the world flattens (Tom Friedman book), ESG issues become more important to shareholder, stakeholder, regulator, lender, corporate executives, and more.  We have come a long way, as Bill points out in his story, but we have a long long way to go to establish uniform ESG standards worldwide, that everyone can agree on…more good news than bad; the glass is filling up. Good work, Bill! – Hank Boerner, CEO of The Governance & Accountability Institute (GAI)


Governance & Accountability Institute is a monitoring, intelligence-gathering and knowledge management center operating at the intersection of powerful forces reshaping relationships between stockholders and stakeholders, and the public corporation. The key players transforming the markets and interacting with corporate management and boards include fund owners and asset managers and their third party advisors-in sovereign wealth funds,socially responsible investment organizations, activist hedge funds, public pension funds, labor union funds, private equity firms, investment banks...and more.

G&A identifies key players, monitors their activities, conducts research, charts the players's influence on capital markets and companies, and provides news and intelligence through G&As "SustainabilityHQTM" advisory services. SustainabilityHQTM resources at the intersections of powerful capital markets players--and the public and private companies they invest in.